Let’s see. Billions in loans to Brazil and Columbia and now supporting this pipeline from Canada. How does any of this help our goal of energy independence? The only reason this looks good to him is that it helps to pay back the unions for their contributions to his re-election campaign and will be a talking point in his campaign. I’m sure any agreement will require union labor. He cares nothing about our energy independence, our balance of payments, or carbon emissions. I surmise this by using logic. Does Brazil, Columbian,and Canadian oil emit less CO2 than US Oil? I think not.
Excerpt: President Obama “is ready to sign off on” the Keystone XL pipeline which aims to carry crude oil from Alberta, Canada to Port Arthur, Texas, an American Petroleum Institute (API) manager told CNSNews.com.
API refining issues manager Cindy Schild made the comment after an Aug. 18 conference call involving API and the International Brotherhood of Teamsters (IBT), which are together promoting the project.
Asked how many jobs would be created through the international project, Schild told CNSNews.com that TransCanada Corp., the project owner, “estimates 20,000 jobs that can be created from the pipeline itself over the two-year project development period.”
“There’s other jobs associated with development of the resource in Canada that have impacts, economic impacts, on U.S. employment as well,” she added. “So, depending where your interests lie, there’s other data there as well on the economic benefits.”
In response to a question about the importance of this project, Schild replied, “Certainly in a time with over nine percent unemployment, you know, even listening to Obama on his bus tour this week, this is something you know he is ready to sign off on – projects that are going to create jobs. And this is unquestionably the single-handed largest shovel-ready project available.”
The Keystone XL project has drawn protests from environmentalists, who have held protests at the White House and elsewhere. The Natural Resources Defense Council says it undermines a U.S. commitment to a “clean energy economy.”
“There’s been an environmental assessment for nearly three years,” Schild said Thursday. “It’s been an open process. There’s been ample opportunity for public engagement; the State Department has been consulting with dozens of agencies from a local state and federal level.
“And it’s been a thoughtful process so at this point, it’s time to move the project forward,” she added. “Hopefully we’re going to see a decision that is favorable to determine that it’s in the national interest and we’ll be able to put these workers to work.”
CNSNews later asked Schild about the partnership between industry and labor in support of the project.
“I think you’re looking at a situation where the unions want work,” she replied. “You’ve got 20,000 potential jobs there. You’ve got workers that are standing there – they’re ready, they’re already contracted and ready for work. So what you’re hearing from the unions is encouragement.”
Read full CNS News article here.